<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Methodology &#8211; REMAP-CAP homepage</title>
	<atom:link href="https://remapcap.co.uk/category/publications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://remapcap.co.uk</link>
	<description>A Randomised, Embedded, Multi-factorial, Adaptive Platform trial for Community-Acquired Pneumonia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 20:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The REMAP-CAP (Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for Community-acquired Pneumonia) Study</title>
		<link>https://remapcap.co.uk/the-remap-cap-randomized-embedded-multifactorial-adaptive-platform-for-community-acquired-pneumonia-study/</link>
					<comments>https://remapcap.co.uk/the-remap-cap-randomized-embedded-multifactorial-adaptive-platform-for-community-acquired-pneumonia-study/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristof Vanmunster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 19:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://remapcap.co.uk/?p=588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Although the trial machinery is very complex, that complexity is made as invisible as possible to the clinical sites. The largest logistical challenges relate to embedding the trial into routine care]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is broad interest in improved methods to generate robust evidence<br>regarding best practice, especially in settings where patient conditions are<br>heterogenous and require multiple concomitant therapies. Here, we present the<br>rationale and design of a large, international trial that combines features of<br>adaptive platform trials with pragmatic point-of-care trials to determine best<br>treatment strategies for patients admitted to an intensive care unit with severe<br>community-acquired pneumonia. The trial uses a novel design, entitled “a<br>randomized embedded multifactorial adaptive platform.” The design has five<br>key features: 1) randomization, allowing robust causal inference; 2) embedding<br>of study procedures into routine care processes, facilitating enrollment, trial<br>efficiency, and generalizability; 3) a multifactorial statistical model comparing<br>multiple interventions across multiple patient subgroups; 4) response-adaptive<br>randomization with preferential assignment to those interventions that appear<br>most favorable; and 5) a platform structured to permit continuous, potentially<br>perpetual enrollment beyond the evaluation of the initial treatments. The trial<br>randomizes patients to multiple interventions within four treatment domains:<br>antibiotics, antiviral therapy for influenza, host immunomodulation with<br>extended macrolide therapy, and alternative corticosteroid regimens,<br>representing 240 treatment regimens. The trial generates estimates of<br>superiority, inferiority, and equivalence between regimens on the primary<br>outcome of 90-day mortality, stratified by presence or absence of concomitant<br>shock and proven or suspected influenza infection. The trial will also compare<br>ventilatory and oxygenation strategies, and has capacity to address additional<br>questions rapidly during pandemic respiratory infections. As of January 2020,<br>REMAP-CAP (Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for<br>Community-acquired Pneumonia) was approved and enrolling patients in 52<br>intensive care units in 13 countries on 3 continents. In February, it transitioned<br>into pandemic mode with several design adaptations for coronavirus disease<br>2019. Lessons learned from the design and conduct of this trial should aid in<br>dissemination of similar platform initiatives in other disease areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://remapcap.co.uk/the-remap-cap-randomized-embedded-multifactorial-adaptive-platform-for-community-acquired-pneumonia-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adaptive platform trials: definition, design, conduct and reporting considerations</title>
		<link>https://remapcap.co.uk/adaptive-platform-trials-definition-design-conduct-and-reporting-considerations/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristof Vanmunster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 19:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Methodology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://remapcap.co.uk/?p=602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers, clinicians, policymakers and patients are increasingly interested in questions about therapeutic interventions that are difficult or costly to answer with traditional, free-standing, parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs)]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Researchers, clinicians, policymakers and patients are increasingly<br>interested in questions about therapeutic interventions that are difficult or costly<br>to answer with traditional, free-standing, parallel-group randomized controlled<br>trials (RCTs). Examples include scenarios in which there is a desire to compare<br>multiple interventions, to generate separate effect estimates across subgroups of<br>patients with distinct but related conditions or clinical features, or to minimize<br>downtime between trials. In response, researchers have proposed new RCT designs<br>such as adaptive platform trials (APTs), which are able to study multiple<br>interventions in a disease or condition in a perpetual manner, with interventions<br>entering and leaving the platform on the basis of a predefined decision algorithm.<br>APTs offer innovations that could reshape clinical trials, and several APTs are now<br>funded in various disease areas. With the aim of facilitating the use of APTs, here<br>we review common features and issues that arise with such trials, and offer<br>recommendations to promote best practices in their design, conduct, oversight<br>and reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
